.

Description of your first forum.

Postby dadman » Tue May 03, 2016 7:46 am

**DNA sequence** ???
your post above ....... are the letters / spaces and punctuation - are they of **A** or **B**
**A** = random / mindless / no structured sequence (just where they happened to land) .. or
**B** = design / code / information / intent / writer-reader / speaker-listener / agenda driven / intelligence
............. http://www.createdebate.com/debate/show ... atheists_3


........ indeed ... so much for the atheist claim of "no evidence" ...
the exact same is true for your dna sequence ( ... apply the intelligence to whom so ever you will
..... end of discussion
http://www.cosmicfingerprints.com/read- ... od-exists/

DNA is biological information sequence
your post above XXXXX ....... are the letters / spaces and punctuation - are they of category A or category B
A = random / mindless / no structured sequence (just where they happened to land) .. or
B = design / code / information / intent / writer-reader / speaker-listener / agenda driven / intelligence

CODE IS DEFINED as communication between an encoder ( a writer or speaker ) and a decoder ( a reader or listener ) using agreed upon symbols . . . DNA's definition as a LITERAL CODE ( and not a figurative one ) is nearly universal in the entire body of biological literature since the 1960's . . . DNA code has much in common with human language and computer languages . . . DNA transcription is an encoding / decoding mechanism isomorphic with Claude Shannon's 1948 model: .. The sequence of base pairs is encoded into messenger RNA which is decoded into proteins .. Genetic information passes from DNA to an RNA copy and then is READ in the cell by the the ribosome which makes a protein molecule based on the genetic information encoded in DNA . . . This is the central tenet of molecular biology . . . Information theory terms and ideas applied to DNA are not metaphorical .. but in fact quite literal in every way . . . In other words .. the information theory argument for design is not based on analogy at all .. it is direct application of mathematics to DNA .. which by definition is a code

THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN PATTERNS AND CODES .... PATTERNS occur naturally .. no help required from a 'designer' . . .
Many patterns occur in nature without the help of a designer .. snowflakes .. tornadoes .. hurricanes .. sand dunes .. stalactites .. rivers and ocean waves . . .
These patterns are the natural result of what scientists categorize as chaos and fractals .. These things are well-understood and we experience them every day ...
CODES .. however .. do not occur without a designer . . . Examples of symbolic codes include music .. blueprints .. languages like English and Chinese .. computer programs .. and yes .. DNA .....
The essential distinction is the difference between a pattern and a code .. Chaos can produce patterns .. but chaos has never been shown to produce codes or symbols . . .
Codes and symbols store information .. which is not a property of matter and energy alone .. Information itself is a separate entity.


















































...
Image
dadman
Site Admin
 
Posts: 3279
Joined: Sat Oct 12, 2013 11:05 am

PreviousNext

Return to Your first forum

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests

cron